Information Literacy Assignment , English homework help

The purpose of this assignment is to learn about information literacy by exploring the concept of peer review. You may be familiar with peer review in prior writing courses, but what does it mean when you talk about peer review in relation to academic source material? Click on the following link to a DeVry University Library presentation of Peer Reviewed Journals: The Creation of New Knowledge. http://library.devry.edu/pdfs/Peer_Review_PPT.pdf The PDF presentation contains 20 slides that will introduce the peer review cycle.After reviewing the presentation, compose a 2-paragraph response in which you address each of the following points:In your own words, identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why.How does an editor differ from a peer reviewer? Use at least two points to support your response.Based on this information, explain whether your article for this week was peer reviewed? How can you determine this information?As you work on your research in this class, where specifically can you look to find peer-reviewed information?http://library.devry.edu/pdfs/Peer_Review_PPT.pdfThese questions are answered from the power point.Peer Reviewed Journals: The Creation of New Knowledge Idea Lit Review Grant Research Interpret Data Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication Idea Lit Review Grant Research Interpret Data Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication The Peer Review process begins with a researcher and a new idea Idea Lit Review Grant Research Collect Data Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication The researcher reviews the literature of her/his field to see what else has been done on the topic Idea Lit Review Grant Research Interpret Data Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication A researcher may secure funding to help pay for her/his research Idea Lit Review Grant Research Interpret Data Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication Conducting the actual research can be an involved and time consuming process Idea Lit Review Grant Research Interpret Data Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication Gathering, analyzing, and interpreting the data is where much of the thought in research occurs Idea Lit Review Grant Research Interpret Data Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication Researchers often present preliminary findings at conferences. These can provide good feedback too Idea Lit Review Grant Research InterpretData Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication With the input from the conference, the researcher will prepare her/his findings for publication Idea Lit Review Grant Research Interpret Data Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication The manuscript is sent to the editor of a suitable journal Idea Lit Review Grant Research InterpretData Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication Experts on the topic review the manuscript (More about this in a moment) Idea Lit Review Grant Research Interpret Data Conferences Write Manuscript Submit Peer Review Publication The journal publishes the article which will inform, enlighten, and prompt new ideas The Researcher submits her/ his manuscript to a journal  The editor reviews for:  Content  Creativity  Clarity  Contribution to the knowledge of the field  If the editor likes it It gets sent to other experts to review The Peer Reviewers  Look to see what is new about the research  Determine if the methodology is sound  Decide if the conclusions are supported  Verify that this is a contribution to the field The Peer Reviewers  Dont know who wrote the manuscript  Are not known to the author of the manuscript  Hence, this is often called a blind review  It is also called a refereed process The Referees/Reviewers:  May recommend it be published as is  Often suggest rewriting and revising  May not like it at all -Journals typically reject more articles than they accept -Prestigious journals may have a 90% rejection rate or higher The Editor:  Ultimately decides what will and will not be published.  Works with the author to see the work through to completion  May be a full-time professional or professor taking on the responsibility Criticisms of the Peer-Review Process: Time consuming Limited number of experts May suppress dissident points of view The Peer Review Process  Spots errors or weaknesses prior to publication  Ensures articles are substantial and unique  Is considered crucial in establishing the validity of research.