Response two

"The NevadaFour Guerrillas had an obligation to the community that they were in not onlyto stop water from ruining the wetlands and killing wildlife but also tomaintain the stability of the p-lace in question. There goals were to “ savethe Stillwater and Carson lake, wetlands from bureau of reclamation irrigationpractices at the Nevada new lands project by diverting water from the wetlandsand inducing water quality problems, increasing flow of water into them andcleaning up toxic sinks” ( O Leary).Using Waldos 12 ethical obligations theguerrillas had an ethical obligation to organize the attack on bureaucratic,and to maintain their professionalism and profession by upholding theconstitution while they were working on maintaining the wetlands. The impact thatthey had on the community not only through public policy but by showing thepeople what was actually happening to the wildlife and what would continue tohappen if something was not done was great and for that the guerillas althoughseen as a pain in the behind by their employers but they also used influence todevelop and support for the bill. A Guerrillas “bring credibility of the formalbureaucratic political system with them as well as the credibility of theirindividual professions they have strong views and at most illegal” (O Leary). I agree with theapproach that the guerillas took in order to protect the wetlands they did whatthey thought was best for this area of Nevada."Respond to the above by using "ONE"of the bulletin point below· Offer and support your differentopinion about the Nevada Four· Expand on your colleagues’ postings bydrawing connections and identifying contrasts between your colleagues’ initialresponses to the case and your colleagues’ support for or against the actionsof the guerrillas.Atleast one reference please