Trademark Law Dilution Assignment, law homework help

Please watch the webinar:“TRADEMARK DILUTION,” available at ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKwXsJgwONYThe film is approximately 30 minutes in length. And answering the following questions:  Does the owner of a famous trademark have to prove economic harm of its mark prior tofiling a dilution cause of action? What section of the Lanham Act specifically addressesthis question?What kind of evidence does the modern trademark owner normally submit to the court inorder to prove that its mark has achieved fame?How specifically did the 2006 Trademark Dilution Revision Act change the Lanham Actwith respect to a dilution cause of action?Do you agree with the 2011 Starbucks court’s decision on remand that there was only a“loose connection” between the defendant’s mark CHARBUCKS and the plaintiff’s markSTARBUCKS, despite evidence of the defendant’s bad intent? Why or why not?Do you think the plaintiff’s design mark used on its jeans in Levi Strauss v. AbercrombieFitch is distinctive pursuant to Section 45 of the Lanham Act? Why or why not?Do you think that the defendant in Harris Research, Inc. v. Lydon has a valid defense thatits CHEM WHO? mark is a parody? Why or why not?