misrepresent or misuse quantum physics, science homework help

Find two articles which somehow misrepresent or misuse quantum physics. For each article, explain in detail- what are the concepts that the articles are misusing?- how are they being misinterpreted or misused?- what is the correct version of the concepts?The more reputable, and widely-read, the site the articles come from, the better!As a conclusion, based on the two articles you're discussing, what general advice would you give to your own students when browsing the internet and discovering articles that make some quantum physics-based claims? What are the red flags you would look for? How would you go about fact-checking the article?Cite your sources (including discussion posts) fully.This project should be about 4-5 pages (single spaced, 12pt font), and be succinct but complete. That amounts to 1-1.5 pages per article, and 1-1.5 pages for the summary and conclusions, and 0.5-1 page for the references.Project RubricCriteriaUnacceptable(0)Poor (1)Good (2)Excellent (3)Source of articlesSource completely obscure with no reputation.Articles from niche, poorly read sources with poor-average reputationsArticles from more niche but still reasonably popular sources that have average-reasonable reputationsArticles from widely read sources that have good reputationsIdentification of Quantum concepts misusedAll misused concepts incorrectly identifiedMost misused concepts incorrectly identifiedMost misused concepts correctly identifiedAll misused concepts correctly identifiedAccuracy of description of quantum conceptsConcept descriptions are entirely wrongConcepts are inaccurately described with many mistakesConcepts are reasonably accurately described with few mistakesConcepts are completely accurately describedConclusionPoorly argued with no points supported by evidence, an of no use for students wishing to fact-check an articlePoorly argued with few points supported by evidence, with little useful information for students wishing to fact-check an articleReasonably argued with most points supported by evidence, with some useful information for students wishing to fact-check an articleWell argued with all points supported by evidence, and useful for students wishing to fact-check an articleOrganization and quality of writingUnacceptable quality of writing; very many spelling and grammatical errors. Essay is unacceptably organized.Poor quality of writing; quite a few spelling, grammatical errors. Essay is poorly organized.Good quality of writing; almost no spelling or grammatical errors. Essay is reasonably organized.Excellent writing quality; no spelling or grammatical errors. Essay is well organized.CitationsNo appropriate citationsA significant number of arguments, quotes and data are notbacked up by appropriate citations.The large majority of arguments, quotes and data are backed up by appropriate citations.All arguments, quotes, and data are backed up by appropriate citations.