Health Policy and Law Basics

As a chief operatingofficer of a hospital, you have been tasked with opening a new ambulatory carecenter in your city.Write a 2-3 pagepaper in which you:Specify whether youwould utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free marketperspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Debateat least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosenperspective. Provide at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action tosupport your response.Analyze the keycomponents of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each sourcecould potentially have on your healthcare organization’s newinitiative.Use at least two (2)quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do notqualify as academic resources.Your assignment mustfollow these formatting requirements:Be typed, doublespaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on allsides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Checkwith your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover pagecontaining the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’sname, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page arenot included in the required assignment page length.The specific courselearning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Describe theevolution of hospitals and sources of law.Examine tort law andthe criminal aspects of health care.Use technology andinformation resources to research issues in healthcare policy, law, andethics.Write clearly andconcisely about healthcare policy and law using proper writingmechanics.Click here to view the grading rubric. Points: 150Assignment 1: Health Policy and Law BasicsCriteriaUnacceptableBelow 60% FMeets Minimum Expectations60-69% DFair70-79% CProficient80-89% BExemplary90-100% A1. Specify whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Debate at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Provide at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response. Weight: 45%Did not submit or incompletely specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Did not submit or incompletely debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Did not submit or incompletely provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.Insufficiently specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Insufficiently debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Insufficiently provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.Partially specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Partially debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Partially provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.Satisfactorily specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Satisfactorily debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Satisfactorily provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.Thoroughly specified whether you would utilize the professional autonomy, social contract, or free market perspective as the paradigm to design the structure of your new center. Thoroughly debated at least two (2) advantages and two (2) disadvantages of your chosen perspective. Thoroughly provided at least two (2) examples of your perspective in action to support your response.2. Analyze the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative. Weight: 40%Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.Insufficiently analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.Partially analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.Satisfactorily analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.Thoroughly analyzed the key components of three (3) sources of law related to the effects that each source could potentially have on your healthcare organization’s new initiative.3. Two (2) References Weight: 5%No references providedDoes not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%More than 8 errors present7-8 errors present5-6 errors present3-4 errors present0-2 errors present