Application: Tyler Clementi, science homework help

Application: Tyler ClementiIn September 2010, Rutgers Universitystudent Tyler Clementi committed suicide by jumping off the George WashingtonBridge. The suicide occurred after the 18-year-old discovered that his intimateencounter with another man in his dorm room was broadcast on the Internet. Theoffenders, Dharun Ravi and Molly Wei, set up a webcam and live streamedClementi’s encounter without his knowledge. In April 2011, Ravi was indicted on15 counts, including invasion of privacy and bias intimidation. Wei was offereda plea bargain to testify against Ravi. Neither offender was charged with thedeath of Tyler Clementi. Questions remain as to whether this was merely adisplay of cyber-hate or if this incident could legally be deemed a hate crime.For this assignment, review the TylerClementi case and think about whether or not Clementi’s right to privacy wasviolated. Consider whether the offense should be considered cyber-hate or ahate crime. Then think about why the offenders were not legally charged withClementi’s death.The Assignment (2–3 pages)Explain whether or not Tyler Clementi’s constitutional right toprivacy was violated.Explain whether the offense should be considered cyber-hate orclassified as a hate crime.Explain why the offenders were not legally charged with the deathof Tyler Clementi.Two or three pages withat least three references....It is important that you cover all the topics identified in theassignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUTpresenting an explanation from the readings.To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed forthis assignments 1) look at the page limits 2) review and follow APA rules3) create SUBHEADINGS to identify the key sections you are presenting and4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.ReadingsCourse Text: Taylor,R. W., Fritsch, E. J., & Liederbach, J. (2015). Digital crime anddigital terrorism. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Chapter 9,"Anarchy and Hate on the World Wide Web"Article: Bailey, J.(2004). Private regulation and public policy: Toward effective restrictionof Internet hate propaganda. McGill Law Journal, 49(1), 59–103.     Article: Foderaro, L.W. (2010, September 29). Private moment made public, then a fatal jump. TheNew York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/nyregion/30suicide.htmlArticle: Guichard, A.(2009). Hate crime in cyberspace: The challenges of substantive criminallaw. Information & Communications Technology Law, 18(2),201–234.     Article: Hu, W. (2010,October 2). Legal debate swirls over charges in a student's suicide. TheNew York Times, p. A15.     Article: Perry, B.,& Olsson, P. (2009). Cyberhate: The globalization of hate. Information& Communications Technology Law, 18(2), 185–199.   WebsiteArticle: InternationalNetwork Against CyberHate (INACH). (n.d.). Retrieved December 15, 2011, fromhttp://www.inach.netArticle:Goldsborough, R. (2001). Dealing with hate on the Internet. TeacherLibrarian, 29(1), 46.     Article:Nemes, I. (2002). Regulating hate speech in cyberspace: Issues ofdesirability and efficacy. Information & Communications TechnologyLaw, 11(3), 193–220.     Article:Tsesis, A. (2001). Hate in cyberspace: Regulating hate speech on theInternet. San Diego Law Review, 38(3), 817.